Searching...
Sep 15, 2008

Google Earth revealed UFO and Alien anomaly, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2008

print this page
send email
One of our reader requested us to look at 46miles from city of Behia Blanca,State-Buenos Aires, Argentina on Google Earth.

Firstly co-author of UFO BLOGGER thought it could be some kind of color error or overlap of image at the time of processing but when we looked at that area it stunned him.


As when he started looking for more information on this site he found other anomaly's and facilities too which made him to rethink about being only a color error.

Finally we all looked on this site and concluded that might be Argentina government or its
counterpart (U.S) could have some kind of secret base on that site. So we started to explore the possibility of American connection in Argentina


For our surprise we find this news article Back in 1988 President Bill Clinton named Argentina the only "major non-NATO ally" in Latin America. CONAE had already participated with NASA in the development of the Satellite de Aplicaciones Cienfifico (SAC) micro satellites as a space-research project. As Argentina continues to seek closer military ties with the United States, mainly through peacekeeping operations, its space program now appears more cooperative with that of the United States. Its plans to develop the Satellites for Observation and Communications (SAOCOM)-1A radar satellite include Italy--another NATO ally of the United States. Also, the United States views the launch of Latinsat-A and -B by Aprize Satellite in 2002 as a commercial endeavor with no national-security implications. One reason the Argentine space program is now perceived as more pro-United States is that most funding for programs with US competitors has largely stopped as a result of the government's fiscal crisis and lingering economic problems

Argentina came more closer to United States when it participate in the 1991 Gulf War under mandate of the United Nations. At that time it was the only Latin American country involved in every phase of the Haiti operation. Source

When we were searching for other sighting which could support this Google Earth object.We found the rephotographs of one of the UFO sighting which took palace in the city of Malargue in the south of the province of Mendoza.And there are really stunning similarity between these two UFO'S.Source

Next step was to look in UFO achiever and more to over surprise we learned that their were lot of UFO activity happening in past too in this area.

Three other accounts from same area in past :-


According to Senor Dionisio Yanca,on October,1973 an Argentine trucker suffering from unexplained shock underwent treatment with sodium pentothal. While under the effect or this truth serum, Senor Yanca claimed he was forced by aliens from another galaxy to spend 1 1/2 hours aboard a flying saucer. Like Barney Hill and Charles Hickson, Senor Yanca stated that the UFO occupants conversed in a "humming" manner.(13:21-A) Senor Yanca maintained that creatures from the spaceship connected a hose to high tension wires and another to a small lagoon. The Bahia Blanca Electric Company reported a sharp and unexplained rise in power consumption at the time and a UFO was sighted by an Argentine airbase near Bahia Blanca on the same day Senor Yanca claimed he was abducted. Senor Yanca cannot remember any portion of the UFO incident when he is conscious and not under the influence of truth. Source

1.Police officers encounter UFO and Aliens,Buenos Aires,Argentina.
2. According to 4 Kids of Concorde, Argentina they had Galaxy tour in UFO

Lets come back to this Argentina Google Earth
UFO:
After studying the past history of UFO phenomena in this area.We concentrated on this Google UFO site which is 46 miles from city of Behia Blanca,State-Buenos Aires, Argentina, Geo location -39° 22' 19.61", -62° 1' 34.67

We looked in three major Map providers sites Yahoo maps,Map.live & Google earth 1st two disappointed us but Google really works for this Geo location.


The object at -39° 22' 19.61", -62° 1' 34.67 was photographed by Google mapping satellite .Its look like satellite camera took the picture of take off ufo from underground base or some hide out.That's not only the object on Google Earth in that location.when we look just next to it,There is an strange structure which look like some kind of humanoid face .We don't know its just there as a coincident or by purpose.

Anomaly structures and coincident not stop here even,less then a mile away we found some kind of installation too.

Finally we find that there is a naval and air base too,which is just less then 45 mile away from this Google UFO site too.

If for instant,we assume that the Google UFO shape formation is only a illusion of salt lake or Google color error but how could all these (Humanoid face,Underground base door,hangers,Unknown Facility and Argentina Air naval defense base)be coincident in less then 45 miles of radius???

When we searched for video footage we find more then 100 UFO video itself on youtube.

We are sure that their is something there which is top secret for rest of the world for sure.


We think we need field investigation and on site inspection of this region by MUFON it self


So guys look for more evidence and information as much you could get and please left comment in comment section so that we could add on more information in this post and changes too....
Rate this posting:
{[['', '']]}
{["Useless", "Boring", "Need more details", "Perfect"]}

34 comments:

  1. I saw your report on MUFON great job.How much time it takes to make this cool video too?? What MUFON think about it?????

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sorry but I firmly believe that the mufon organization has been compromised for quite some time. Everyone here should understand why.

      Delete
  2. Nice video skills. I'll give you that.

    But you're looking too hard for something that's not existing. In the process you're trying to find aliens in outlines or trees, and it's just too much of a stretch. Your imagination has gotten the best of you. There are hundreds of Google imaging errors ranging from over-exposure, to sun reflection on the camera glass which gets layered over everyday terrain and in this case, a farm clearing. nothing more.

    Again, good video, but there's no evidence there.

    I know. You'll come back with some line like "who pays you... CIA?" Hardly. Try to take this critique as a balanced view of things.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nope you not for CIA but from ats shit lolz.Those guys not ready to take what is is its all about .He already asked MUFON so let wait and see what is this all about. And i think you not even read full post and other references.Any way nice try to debunk it but we need proof here at :) GOOD JOB u b..

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with both of the above posts.
    It will be interesting if mufon can make a more scientific investigation... (Like actually go there) Ok so there is some kind of base or something in the woods.... What the fuck dudes!? why did you start talking about a face in the woods?? That's the sort of thing that makes debunkers jobs so much easier.

    And the picture of that purple/black ufo. That is the sun. Most cheap digital cameras do that when something gets too bright. They turn of the pixels so they wont be damaged... Why the shape of a ufo? because if you didn't know what a ufo looked like, it would look like a round light source with some lens flares on the sides (gone black by over-exposure).

    And i'm not working for the cia either.

    There might be something there but your'e way too blinded by excitement to draw any conclusions on this subject.

    Regards
    J

    disclosure.baywords.com

    ReplyDelete
  5. Last anon i think you dnt get what U.B is saying Read it "So guys look for more evidence and information as much you could get and please left comment in comment section so that we could add on more information in this post and changes too...."

    About cheap camera you don't have to forget Google have billion $ satellites :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Again, And Thanks J for understanding and I agree with your comment that in their excitement they're digging for too much.

    Believe me, I have found stuff on Google Earth that's questionable. Like I was looking at a childhood place of mine and over the town there's a light in the shape of a cross. Well, it's not a cross. It's a light reflection. Nothing more.

    Still, I do congratulate this Blogger's video editing skills (keep it up, they're good, music and all). And I'll let you know if I come across more Google Earth light anomalies.

    ReplyDelete
  7. to the 7:29 PM anonymous poster.

    "So guys look for more evidence and information as much you could get and please left comment in comment section so that we could add on more information in this post and changes too...."

    Yes i left my thoughts on the "evidence".

    So google have billion $ sattelites?... What's that have to do with the "sun-ufo" in this picture?

    http://bp2.blogger.com/_basraNod1Ms/SFPunWxQnkI/AAAAAAAAAME/M9TxB2fvQE4/s1600-h/malarque.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi. I wasn't the one that added something about Google's satellite, but I will support his comment. His reference to Google's satellite was that it's new and recently launched and will provide new clearer and cleaner images, photos which will start to replace those lens flare photo which get you so excited.

    As for the photo you provided in the above link. It's pretty well photoshop, a doctored image. Seriously, there are much better UFO photos out there than that.

    There isn't much to discuss re: this Argentina underground base. It's just comical. Sorry. Time to move on.

    ReplyDelete
  9. >>anonymous 8:28 PM.<<

    Read the correspondence before you decide to post.
    ------------------------
    ME
    "the picture of that purple/black ufo. That is the sun. Most cheap digital cameras do that when something gets too bright. They turn of the pixels so they wont be damaged... Why the shape of a ufo? because if you didn't know what a ufo looked like, it would look like a round light source with some lens flares on the sides (gone black by over-exposure)."

    OTHER GUY
    About cheap camera you don't have to forget Google have billion $ satellites :)

    ME
    So google have billion $ sattelites?... What's that have to do with the "sun-ufo" in this picture?

    http://bp2.blogger.com/_basraNod1Ms/SFPunWxQnkI/AAAAAAAAAME/M9TxB2fvQE4/s1600-h/malarque.jpg

    (This is the picture i was talking about in my first post.... the one that's on the UB site).

    YOU
    As for the photo you provided in the above link. It's pretty well photoshop, a doctored image. Seriously, there are much better UFO photos out there than that.

    ------------------------

    So Mr. Anonymous. I'm a professional photographer and own a photo retouching company. I think i know what i'm talking about. That image is not doctored. It's an effect caused by a cheap digital camera to protect the camera sensor. Every time i see this effect in pictures and on youtube i try to tell people but somehow they cant seem to understand.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Here are some examples of "black sun" effect.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=baOEVh79dDI
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rb0G-ZC-j34
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N78Eg0FYGvc&feature=related

    ReplyDelete
  11. maybe even better.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5OltSfO9Ug

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hey J Said,

    First off, thanks for keeping it civil. I appreciate open and friendly discussions. I've posted here before only to be told off and cursed at by the moderator or owner of this blog. So that's discouraging.

    And secondly, thanks for telling us that the spot over the sun is indeed a protective measure from digital cameras to protect the lens. I'm in the IT field and it's hard to keep up with all the computerized enabled features out there. So it's good to know that cameras have this in place.

    And I'm also glad that we can agree that this recent Argentina underground base and some related material posted in the video/text/blog seems debunked by a suspicious lens or reflective effect.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hmmm… pretty sure this story has been around longer than a couple of weeks U.B (or should we call you U.Bs?) hasn’t that face been used before?

    Black sun & camera effects aside, seeing faces etc in the landscape is nothing new…illussions of mother nature with weathering n erosion of karst landscapes create all sorts images! its pos something to do with filters/color grading (not error – color gets exaggerated) on the satellite images. Has you looked at the NASA sat images? Or any other sat image providers other than free ones?? Like the satellite imaging corp or terrasat which are on google search?? Or just stuck to the one that gave you the image you wanted? yous need to look at more & overlay to each other so colors used to highlite relief don’t provide false impression.
    As for unmarked site in your video looks like someone’s ocean view mansion & formal gardens so wouldn’t be marked.

    Argentines military presence in area is interesting but with big town close n near coast maybe coincidence as they wanted territory in falklands in past...

    be interested to see what MUFON say about it n if they send team to investigate – keep us posted U.B :)

    ReplyDelete
  14. anonymous 9:35 PM

    Did i confuse people? I'm confused.
    I've never claimed that the satellite image anomaly is due to reflective or lens effect. Although it might be. I was all along just talking about the "black sun effect".

    What i'm trying to do is contribute with my expertise in my field to help UB understand their finds so that they may present a more credible story. therefore i sticked to the thing i know something about. That is stuff like lens, film and sensor artifacts and camera / photoshop stuff.

    And last but not least.
    Please people, take the time to come up with an Alias so that we can refer to each other easier.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I'm AV. Pleased to meet you J. (alias)

    No, you're not confused, and sorry if that seems the case. There were two of us referring to Google's satellite. And we're all clear you're contributing your camera technology expertise.

    ReplyDelete
  16. hey AV
    thanx for making that clear. yes i was confused because people only referred yo my alias. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  17. Ok guys now could you ans this what U.B asked in his post before shouting on him"If for instant,we assume that the Google UFO shape formation is only a illusion of salt lake or Google color error but how could all these (Humanoid face,Underground base door,hangers,Unknown Facility and Argentina Air naval defense base)be coincident in less then 45 miles of radius???"

    Who said U.B in exitment talking like this i think you should read full post he already cleard his point that when he looked at it he is really open minded.

    And could you tell me is this only an coincident that all these event happen in past in same area?????

    And those who said its lens its easy to denie....So i suggest you guys its better mufon look on this site before debunking with stupid reasions.As i am from indian well know image processin studio and i know what we looking are not just lens deffect.

    Could you explaien me what that unknow dacility is and whats about that bunker in this site???????????????

    I find cool taht these images are still on google earth otherwise debuker start shoting these images get phtoshoped lolz.I am at ATS too and i know how they come up with stupid ideas crap shit.

    Finally i thanks U.B to bring this cool site.

    Great blog U.B keep it up !!!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Of course it's not a coincidence. Bunkers and stuff are always common around military facilities. Take a peek around other military bases and you'll se. And that other place looks more like some rich guys place with a rose garden or something. I'm not saying it's nothing there. I'm just saying that i'm not taking any of ...(Humanoid face,Underground base door,hangers,Unknown Facility and Argentina Air naval defense base)... as something convincing me that the satellite image is something real.

    ReplyDelete
  19. hi from london

    These fuckers never read to burn thr as who call the them debunkers lolz.Diffenatly coming from ATS shit lolz.

    They never ready to take it U.B .Even you fuck thr mother they still say no its just an illustion or project bluebeam lolz :) great post U.B

    ReplyDelete
  20. AV. Hey "anonymous from London"... nice cursing. And what were you trying to say?

    ReplyDelete
  21. what ever to guy come up with debunker's always come with excuses.What London guy try to say what i think _:_

    ReplyDelete
  22. Good Job i must say U.B i also think mufon should look in to it

    ReplyDelete
  23. AV here: "What London guy try to say what i think _:_"

    Please take an English grammar/ writing course so we can understand your argument.

    As for debunking: sometimes some things are created from over-active imaginations, and this is the case this time around.

    Perhaps we could all be smarter by spending our time and energy finding the truth behind 'real' mysteries.

    Less swearing. More constructive criticism.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Av are you CIA as****e???

    ReplyDelete
  25. i checked the spot on g.earth.its only a sand patch reflection with a small sand path leading to it.check the area around it,you'll see the sand glows the same color.nothing odd here,just peoples perception on an isolated image,you have to see the area around it to get a better perspective.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Take a look at:
    -39° 22' 15.05", -62° 00' 53.52

    Better Alien Face.

    ReplyDelete
  27. LAST NIGHT MY MOM AND MY SISTER AND ME SEEN SOMETHING FLY IN THE SKY AND IT LANDED IN A FEILD WE WENT TO GO SEE IT BUT WE DIDN'T SEE ANYTHING ? FROM ANONYMOUS. P.S I THOGHT IT WAS A UFO.

    ReplyDelete
  28. mufon cant help anyone now!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  29. Also if you go back in time ie, 2003 (picture next to the sunrise on the toolbar and drag it back)it only appeared in 2004, before that, that road or whatever it was was not there

    ReplyDelete
  30. hey guys well just sum thing i should say i was on google earth and looking at my old house and then saw a ufo but not sure wat it is plus the sun is pointing in that diriction and keeps showing in street view all through out my block and if you dont belive me check it out my old address is (1314 north highland ave colton CA) check it out and email me at juliohasgomez@yahoo.com or myspace me and add me search me up with my old email julio.has.gomez@gmail.com my names julio by the way

    ReplyDelete
  31. What the skeptics fail to understand that not every thing is in the third dimension. What is in the 4th and 5th diemsnion cannot be seen by us unless your consiousness is higher. If the assumption is : if you dont' see it it doesn't exist, then we are like a fish in the pond who says that trees don't exist (a cheapy example).
    peace
    anthoni Ji

    ReplyDelete
  32. ha you i know alot than this crap hah trust me i know

    ReplyDelete
  33. this video deserves further investigation from MUFON. Every time that something of this nature comes up there is a bunch of "debunkers" that try to downplay the facts. For so many years people tried to debunk the Roswell incident but now that more and more true facts are revealed that, that was in fact an ufo crash the "debunkers say "oh that is so old and who cares" well. I for one (and I am sure many others) care so keep up the good work.

    ReplyDelete