Physicist offers scientific proof that crop circles are formed by UFO'S - UFO News | Aliens | UFO Sightings | Space News | UFO 2017
Apr 10, 2009

Physicist offers scientific proof that crop circles are formed by UFO'S

Physicist offers scientific proof that crop circles are formed by UFO'S

In the down below video the producers of video documentary interviewed physicist Dr. Eltjo Haselhoff of the Netherlands. Dr. Haselhoff offers scientific proof that at least some crop circles are indeed formed by balls of light/UFO'S. His research and evidence was even accepted after peer review for the Internationally recognized scientific journal, Physiologia Plantarum.

He showed that the crop circles he examined had been made by electromagnetic point-sources. An example of an electromagnetic point-source is a light bulb. Dr. Haselhoff made his discovery by examining the anomalies he found in the nodes of the crop circle plants. When he measured the nodes of all the samples he had taken, he found that the nodes in the centre of the circles had elongated tremendously. The nodes of the plants that had grown at the perimeter of the circles, did show elongation, but not quite as much as the ones he had found in the centres. Dr Haselhoff developed a software programme to have his computer measure the nodes once more (thus excluding the possibility of human errors) and had his computer carry out many hundreds of measurements.

In the first row you see the anomalous node length in the crop circle. In the second row you see where Dr. Haselhoff take his samples.The red bars in the diagrams show normal, natural growth differences that may occur. It is quite clear that the crop circle differences are so extreme (yellow bars), that this cannot be attributed to normal growth difference...

Dr. Haselhoff then compared the distribution of node lengthening (strongest in the crop circle centre, less and less towards the perimeter) with all possible energy distribution patterns known in physics. He discovered a 100% match with the energy distribution of an electromagnetic point-source. This is for instance a light bulb. When you hang a light bulb above the ground, you will also see a (light) distribution that is strongest directly below the bulb (to be compared with the crop circle centre) and which becomes fainter and fainter as you measure towards the edge of the light.

A 100% match is very rare in science. Therefore the following conclusion could safely be drawn: the examined crop circles had been made by electromagnetic point-sources (balls of light) hanging above the ground at a height of 4.1 meters at the time the crop went down.

Dr. Haselhoff sent his findings to Physiologia Plantarum. His work was 'peer-reviewed' (checked by other scientists), accepted and published in October 2000. With this publication and thus acceptance by the scientific world, one can say that the current state of affairs if as follows: Crop circles are not made by man, but by electromagnetic point-sources of unknown origin.

This fact stands until the opposite is proven scientifically!

Note :
We wanted to let you know that the film of the balls of light may not be a hoax(As many debunker claimed) and Youtube have completely deleted this video from their website - Here is the proof

There is a lot of disinformation put out by various governments - who will immediately discredit crop circles and videos such as this.

Read this article to get an idea of what we mean.

The fact is the videographer (who came forward and is not anonymous) never said his video was a fake (though fake versions have not shown up on the net afterwards).

It's really amazing how easy and quick it is to discredit footage such as this. All it takes is for one person to say "this was proven to be a hoax" to completely discredit the footage. source


  1. I'm not a skeptic, but I like to keep things balanced. Is a fact that The work of Eltjo got published in Physiologia Plantarum, but also is a fact that this Journal's Editor has publicly regret that the article was ever published there. There are also other articles that have reviewed Eltjo's work and have found a biased selection of data to support the model.

    I believe many crop circles are not man made, but Eltjo's work is not a proof.

    1. Hasselhoff just published a new article in peer-reviewed literature, where the 'biased selection' is also addressed. He shows that he was right after all. It turns out the ones that attacked him had not understood his work and used all wrong values because they did not have all the information. They never asked Haselhoff because they published behind his back in stead of first asking him for feedback or the missing data.

  2. Oya good way to discredit the whole study !!

    Anyway could you please provide "other articles that have reviewed Eltjo's work and have found a biased "

    Thanks UFO Blogger for putting this fascinating finding regarding Crop Circles

  3. its proven that the cropcircle follow the same physics we use to build your TV for example. it has been proven not only by this physicist. to write one is not a skeptic and in the same sentence discrediting a person really needs some kind of mental disorder - spinning things isnt exactly 'cool' its a way to lie to oneself but focusing on how well one can do this - ill isnt it? :)

    and PROOF, my friend, isnt something you have to decide about ... if something is coherent with the physical, chemical, you-name-it THEORIES, LAWs than it is proof. And that cropcircle can be discussed using these Laws like the beer-lambert law is JUST scientific work, nothing more nothing less - do your homework you NOT-Skeptic Spin-Doctor :P -PROOF-wanting-wanna-be

  4. uh i forgot-

    if something is coherent with the laws and theories mostly everything is fine. Challenging these laws and theories leads directly to beeing thrown out of the scientific buisness. So in other words if your work is coherent but challenges believe-systems, like eltjo's work does, it gets into the realm of BELIEVE. Someone is not ready to BELIEVE what is coherent, than there must be failures or something is not right with the Physicist who did the work. We're so proud on having said 'God is dead' but we are believers through and through - we're not yet Knowers through and through, otherwise these discussions about Believing in someone would be obsolet - Face it! it has nothing changed since the middle-ages we just have MORE/OTHER_THINGs to fight War about... beeing indoctrinated by Media.
    Science is another Playing-field of Trust in something (believe). As Religion is/was. Beeing into it it structures People's Lives and they feel (at least) ability to somehow stand in for the Knowing of something one can not describe - if one cannot describe anymore it is about Believe_or_die as we saw it in the Crusades or now with the Terrorist (this scam-media-thing) or it is with scientist - if mankind is not able to believe in peace/Proof_we_are_not_alone_and_the_center_of_creation/Life/Universe/Solarsystem (and havent been invade by bad bad aliens since : proof for they are nice) there has to be war.
    Its all the same. Be truthfull ... enjoy the coming times, we will be challenged on every level, its better to be open by default not the other way around

  5. Thank you for posting this. It's a very informative look at the phenomena, and with Dr. Eltjo Haselhoff offering his research, we are able to make a more informed personal decision on these things.

  6. To the anonymous jackass above: Just because you ramble on and on doesn't make what you're saying any more intelligent. Don't insult other people by implying you know something others don't, because you just come off sounding like a whiney 15 year old with a chip on your shoulder.


    Page 576.

    Here Hasselhoff responds to the article that accuses him of being biased. it turns out the story is a little different...!

    Clearly - don't believe others, think for yourself. Hasselhoff was attacked on the person, and it seemed to be a dirty game.

  8. Although I am new to crop circke research, I do not believe it is possible for any human to do such a thing in such a short amount of time...especially without being noticed. Think of it like burglary. We know that burglars can get away without being noticed at all by any witnesses, but being that there are so many burglaries in our nation, sometimes it is caught on camera. Sometimes somebody sees somebody. To carry things out such as burglary, time is necessary. What hoaxer would have the guts to create something so detailed which on human terms takes lots of time, only to get caught in the act? I am sorry but it does not add up to me. We do not understand all the mysteries of this universe...plain and simple. It is one thing if ppl could just research it with an open mind to any possibility...but another thing when scientists and skeptics rigidly insist it was caused by humans or the wind...or animals...when we all know that these hypotheses are extremely unlikely given the capabilities of humans, wind and animals.

    1. As far as human made crop circles are concerned, the theory is that it's usually a team of people working together to make them. They plan out how it's supposed to look in advance, gather up members and materials, scout the area, and go at night. So while it probably wouldn't be easy to do it, it's not impossible. Then again, it could just be aliens. Or a combination. Or any of the other theories out there.