Time Traveler Caught On Charlie Chaplin 1928 Film 'The Circus' - UFO News | Aliens | UFO Sightings | Space News | UFO 2017
Searching...
Oct 22, 2010

Time Traveler Caught On Charlie Chaplin 1928 Film 'The Circus'

Time Traveler Caught On Charlie Chaplin 1928 Film "The Circus"

Earlier this year we reported :

DARPA teleportation program Pegasus [Link]
Time traveler caught in museum photo? [Link]
Swiss watch was found in 400 year old tomb in China [Link]
CERN Scientists Eye Extra dimensions breakthrough [Link]

Now in latest development we have amazing video in which, time traveler caught on Charlie Chaplin 1928 film "The Circus"

According to George Clarke, down below piece of video footage found by him in Charlie Chaplin film DVD 'The Circus'.

Attending the premiere at Manns Chinese Theatre in Hollywood, CA - the scene shows a large woman /man dressed in black with a hat hiding most of his/her face, with what can only be described as a mobile phone device - talking as she walks alone.

He added : I have studied this film for over a year now - showing it to over 100 people and at a film festival, yet no-one can give any explanation as to what she is doing.

My only theory - as well as many others - is simple... a time traveler on a mobile phone. See for yourself and feel free to leave a comment on your own explanation or thoughts about it.



Clip Source : The Circus

87 comments:

  1. Just one question, what network is she on because the reception must be amazing? If she's on a phone who is she speaking to what mast is nearby etc. just a thought.

    ReplyDelete
  2. how would a mobile phone work in 1928? where would it connect to?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Possible , He / She is not alone in a time travel.

      Delete
    2. Walkie Talkies were invented somewhere 1934 and 1941 while cellphones are 1940++. This movie is 1928.If this was a toy , WHAT THE HELL WILL YOU CALL THAT? If Cellphone / Walkie Talkie , Then why did it come to 1928?
      But I believe in Time Travels cause nothing is impossible.

      Delete
  3. Well, when it comes to time travel, it's not out of the realm of possibilities that communication devices using quantium computing could simply make a call to the future. Also, it's possible satellites could be in place. Eh?

    Think about it!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Satan took Jesus "into" a high mountain and shown him the kingdoms of this world....What was in that mountain??? Monitors! Technology is not new, Just to us it seems to be.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Glad your keen eye caught this curiosity. It is very interesting. I will share it with other inquiring minds!

    ReplyDelete
  6. It's possible that her husband (lover) smacked her upside the head and she's got an icepack on the side as she's bitching about the pain. My 2 cents.

    ReplyDelete
  7. 1. The guy plays an old magic trick. He tells you what you are going to see before you see it. Power of suggestion. If he was really interested in knowing what you think, he would not tell you what you will see/think.

    2. You cannot say she is talking. There is no sound. Her mouth appears to be moving. She may be talking but there are many reasons why someone's mouth moves.

    3. Is there something in her hand? I dont know. The images are not clear enough. Even if there is something in her hand you surely cannot say it is a device.

    4. Her hand is not positioned they way a normal person grasps a cell phone while it is in use.

    5. Whether it is a man or a woman is irrelevant. Irrelevant data used to cloud the issue.

    6. The surprised look on her face. So what? You would be surprised too if you realized someone was filming you.

    ReplyDelete
  8. @ Last Anonymous

    1.1. The guy plays an old magic trick. He tells you what you are going to see before you see it. Power of suggestion. If he was really interested in knowing what you think, he would not tell you what you will see/think.

    The same "magic" trick used in the preface of every instructional manuel ever printed in the history of the world? The same "magic" used at the beginning of every rudimentary educational class--pick a topic--in the history of the world?

    Oh, yeah--that "magic".

    2.2 You cannot say she is talking. There is no sound. Her mouth appears to be moving. She may be talking but there are many reasons why someone's mouth moves.

    One may easily surmise that she's talking, without stretching either logic or credibility. The movement of the mouth-muscles seem rather limited to talking--in it's various manifestations of conversation, screaming, whispering, singing--or to eating, vomiting, or the production of various communicative-grimaces, smiling being but one.

    She's not vomiting. Nor is she eating.

    She's definitely making communicative grimaces. Is she communicating with a mental illness--itself as hypothetical as the alleged cellphone--or with another entity via something being held to her head in the general area of her ear?

    She is, however, making communicative-grimaces, not the least of which is the surprise she clearly exhibits when she realizes that she's in the camera's field as she's making facial grimaces while clutching something in her hand at the side of her head (a pose which is commonplace nowadays, and generally--in theory and in practice--linked to the useage of a CELLPHONE as one walks down the street.

    3.3 Is there something in her hand? I dont know. The images are not clear enough. Even if there is something in her hand you surely cannot say it is a device.

    Equally, and just as surely, you cannot say that it isn't a device.

    Whatever it is, it's smaller than a bread-box.

    4. Her hand is not positioned they way a normal person grasps a cell phone while it is in use.

    Indeed? It looks remarkably standard to me. And I suspect that the majority of cellphone users have, at one time or another, held their cellphones EXACTLY as that person appears to be doing...not at all a non-standard or gymnastic poise of the hand to the head. Quite the contrary.

    5. Whether it is a man or a woman is irrelevant. Irrelevant data used to cloud the issue.

    I agree it's irrelevant data.

    But I disagree that it's in any way STRONG enough to have been purposively introduced to cloud the data surrounding the issue. It's a puerile observation, probably attesting more to an aspect of the psychology of the presenter than to any purposeful introduction to "cloud the issue".

    Also, the REPEATED closeups and reruns of the person focused almost entirely upon the head/hands/face without comment regarding specific morphology. There was no attempt to cloud the issue thru distraction due to the mention of possible gender-confusion. It was a subsidiary observation made by the presenter, perhaps more indicative of an aspect of his psychology than pertinent to the fact.

    6. The surprised look on her face. So what? You would be surprised too if you realized someone was filming you.

    The surprised look and the moment of it's exhibition is significant for several reasons.

    It strongly indicates that the person was not an EXTRA OR STAGEHAND associated with the filming of the piece. (They might well know or expect that filming would be underway if they were associated with the production, no?)

    The surprise look indicates both dawning realization of the filming, as the person momentarily rises from the distraction of whatever is going on with their hand. The facial grimaces before this moment of realization indicate a strong probability of communication, either with oneself, or with someone absent but communicating through whatever may be clutched in the hand.

    ReplyDelete
  9. To understand this you would need to avoid trying to identify this object by today's way of life. If we didn't have the mobile phone in existence today, what would we conclude this held object to be? Try and imagine being in the 1920s. The answer might be simple.

    ReplyDelete
  10. ......walkie talkie.........

    ReplyDelete
  11. This is really fascinating footage. Really something taken straight out of a Science Fiction Movie!

    I to could be sceptical too. However let´s face it - It really does look like someone walking with a communications device.

    I myself have held my phone like that, with the thought of hiding it so it would not be snatch from me!

    My thoughts now are, what the heck do can be done about this?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Doesn't mean it's a mobile phone.

    Maybe she's wounded in the face and is holding a raw steak to help it heal.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Coming from a music background, one thing I have to point out as a possibility is pulling the back of your ear forward in order to hear your own voice clearly, especially over ambient noise. This would have been common practice for any stage performer back then. Also, if you try this yourself, you'll see how easily the hand takes the exact position shown in this footage: index and middle finger together to hold the ear while the ring and pinkie fingers bend and separate naturally.

    The "cell phone" is just an illusion. It's probably just hair. Besides, that's a big cell phone to be from an era of time travel technology.

    It makes sense to use people in entertainment as extras, and this person could have simply chose a bad time to listen to his/her self. They would know there's no audio, but might not think about how this looks until realizing that the camera is on them. Seriously, this explains it all.

    ReplyDelete
  14. My only problem with the "there are no cell towers in 1928" explanation is that it assumes this time traveler is alone. (and that he is speaking through some sort of interdimensional phone)

    A more plausible explanation would be that multiple travelers are in the area and have deployed their own communcations system ... perhaps we're seeing not just a lone time traveler, but a member of a mission with multiple travelers involved.

    ReplyDelete
  15. i have this movie at home but i didn't find the scene,at what time in the movie is that scene???

    ReplyDelete
  16. I don't know if time travel will be ever possible but one thing is more possible then time travel , he/she could be an alien who looks like us and talking by a mobile phone , or something like a mobile phone , with other aliens in our planet . If there are some people from other planet on our world they probabily look like us to stay easier here to study us .
    This could be a good hypothesis to axplain this fact.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Shes hiding her face from the camera with gloves.

    Just take pair of leather gloves and curl them to your hand and try to hide your face.

    And she turns and smiles cause shes on camera.

    Come on.... Clive you need to come back to reality.

    ReplyDelete
  18. WHATEVER IS GOING ON, SOMETHING AINT RIGHT HERE... THE PERSON SHOWN HERE DOES NOT HAVE THE FEET, HANDS, OR GAIT OF A WOMAN.

    ReplyDelete
  19. a time traveler wouldnt openly walk to a crowded movie theater speaking on a cell phone in 1928.

    ReplyDelete
  20. If she is a time traveler, then in the future she will watch this video before the travel, and then she will use a handsfree.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Its obvious shes on the terrorist cell phone network... duh..

    ReplyDelete
  22. This BLEW MY MIND!!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Hmm well i definitely don't blame the guy for thinking this is SOMETHING, and he's defintely not making things up or trying to trick anyone, it IS what it is. I think we'd need to ask a historian what WOULD someone in 1920 something be holding to their ear like that.

    But the question i ask myself is: IF one did have a device from the future etc, would you not HIDE IT?! You wouldn't be just walking around in public using it correct?? Thats the only thing to me that cancels out it really being something extraordinary. So therefore i think it must be something else.

    ReplyDelete
  24. So, wait... A film maker "finds" this footage...

    Has anyone else seen it on their own copy?

    ReplyDelete
  25. "Can you hear me now?"

    ReplyDelete
  26. Okay, IF a time traveler was actually there, then there must have been a reason, correct? Figure out what the reason was first, through a process of elimination, and if by chance a reason is discovered, then there may be motive to accompany the smoking gun. What happened on that day, historically, in that area, that might prompt a time traveler to return to the scene to either change history or witness an event that occurred? Does anyone have an exact date and time the premier took place? Secondly, and this might be key, but were there any other cameras rolling that day? Cameras, that filmed moving pictures, were the latest and greatest technology of the day and there might be the slight possibility that another camera filmed something from another angle that was recorded and included in similar footage for posterity's sake. Find more footage of the same event - it's a shot in the dark, but so is the possibility of validating this to be an authentic time traveler, caught on camera, in 1928 quite frankly. Did anything, particularly fantastic and noteworthy, happen in history on this exact day anywhere in the world? If so, check any available footage for the same sort of entity - seems they would be there as well? Who knows, perhaps they just took a quick jump over to see the Chaplin premier because they are big Charlie fans from the future or something?

    ReplyDelete
  27. I've always said that there can only be 3 explanations for the existence and or sighting of UFOS #1 The elites of this world have high tech toys and are keeping them a secret , #2 Time travel is a reality and #3 Ufos and aliens really do exist and are extraterrestrial in origin . So who da hell knows ,, that may just be a cell phone. If that be the case , then either scenario #1 or #2 would apply in this case

    ReplyDelete
  28. Or it could have been a spy dressed in drag on a two way radio

    ReplyDelete
  29. Might be the 2-time Academy Award winning Canadian actress Marie Dressler. Looks like her.

    Perhaps she was shielding her eyes from the bright light, or shielding her face from an unexpected newsreel camera. Perhaps her gloved fingers were curled from holding a pair of opera glasses.

    ReplyDelete
  30. people always look past the obvious, simple answers...

    You know they did have a sense of humour back in 1928 did you ever stop to think that they put that in there just to fuck with people?

    Stop looking for mysteries that aren`t there.

    ReplyDelete
  31. why couldn't it be a time traveler!!!! -

    we are talking dimensions here, not a new topic but now revealed to the masses as doable via experiments through CERN (Geneva) - it maybe new to us because let's face it, we are all treated like Mushrooms - "kept in the dark and fed bullshit" (for those of you unfamiliar with the definition of "mushroom")!!!

    ReplyDelete
  32. I don't see any device. I think I see an empty hand when she/he turns towards the camera. Look at the fingers. Scratches ear and mutters to her/himself. A better footage might make it possible to actually see anything.

    Time traveller? Sure, maybe. Anything is possible, but I think something natural is lot more likely, albeit not as exciting

    ReplyDelete
  33. I have met a time traveller, from the 28th century, she was very interested in the gadgets she saw in my home. She told me many things including how items like personal computers and communication devices including mobile phones and television became obsolete in the latter part of the 21st century.She told me people were implanted with a biophoton implant which could be understood as a "computer" interfacing with the brain. This allowed telepathic communication.She told me she was able to travel through what we call time by manipulation of gravity and that time does not really exist as we know it. She described many universes and said they could be understood by imagining many overlapping spirals like multiple coiled springs. By manipulating gravity the coils could be pulled together. Time, she told me could be understood as the cols stretching apart. Moving further away but never disconnected.
    My point is time travellers do not have mobile phones, so whatever this clip shows, it does not show a tme traveller.
    She also told me that ghosts and aliens etc are on coils of the spring and that some people can affect gravity with their minds and pull coils closer together hence the images. Her final comment was to explain that everything in what we call the universe including time and gravity is merely an aspect of thought or imagination.She said mind was the spring and everything that was, is or will be.

    ReplyDelete
  34. This person is not from the future,
    this person is from the past. There is obscure record of at least four males who were promised that they could live in mortality (slightly
    altered of course) till the second
    coming. They are sure to have technologies for communication from
    previous civilizations that we know almost nothing about but clearly had at least everything we do for power,
    flight and communications. Animals and Noah's family were not the only cargo of the ark. They would have brought everything they would have thought they needed from their lives before the flood. Some of the extremely advance technology would have survived the flood, and become more and more impossible to maintain and recreate till very few, only the
    immortals (four only known) would have preserved a power supply and communication devices, at the time of Christ and after through the dark ages, and after, as civilizations became again enlightened. It is possible these
    (at least) four, have worked behind the scenes all along to help enhance the experience of mankind wherever possible. There is record of two unknown guys at the debate over the Constitution
    who spurred acceptance of it from the sidelines. There are hundreds
    of anecdotes from history that can only be explained by such persons
    still living on earth.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I should have added to my earlier post about meeting a time traveller that time travel does not happen in the physical sense as we know it. She told me it happens in the mind but seems physical ie external to the mind. She told me we will all be time travellers but did not explain how or when. She told me to look at the stars and think of them as thoghts in the mind. I did not understand this or many of the other things she tells me on her visits. Apart from these experiences I am just an average person.

    ReplyDelete
  36. 2 way radio wasn't invented back then.

    ReplyDelete
  37. To me its fairly clear, telephones excisted and if you google 1930s and telephone you see exactely what the video shows. They have just cut off the cord and the woman is using it as it were a hand held device. If you look at the light and shadows of the device it really looks like the old phones.

    ReplyDelete
  38. This video is very interesting and is very strange at the same time.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Never heard of Jill Vernes? This could be just an idea genius Chaplin brought in.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Maybe this time traveller was involved in stopping an event and by doing so they changed the course of history and now time travel will never exist. But if time travel never exists they can't go back. And if they can't go back the event will still happen ... my head hurts

    ReplyDelete
  41. Wasn't many fat people in 1928 either yet she's morbidly obese. Good find

    ReplyDelete
  42. i can clearly read her lips ... she's saying "houston, we have a problem" :D

    ReplyDelete
  43. It looks like she's talking on a red shoe!

    ReplyDelete
  44. In 1998 My sister disappeared. I had no idea where she was until this moment. That is my sister.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Huumm , It took me awhile to see this time traveler.But what caught my eye is the figure on the Right side of the photo . looks like a face of what some would call an older alien of sorts. See it ?

    ReplyDelete
  46. Humanity today lacks the strength in its own future possilities.
    If man was to open his mind to what may and does lay ahead, he would be given many insights from other sources outside his own scope of intelligence. "Yes," definitely, we are visited not only from those from other planets but from earths future as well. The earth is rapidly approaching a great change and it is attracting many other life forms other than humans. Time travellers are just one of "many."

    ReplyDelete
  47. Colop U Uichkin10/24/2010 07:27:00 AM

    Wonderful to see such creative minds and imaginations. A time traveler in the open on a cell phone...maybe ordering a pizza to be ready for their return to current time? obviously time travel is an entertainment activity...lets go back in time to see Charlie Chapan, that guy was hilarious! Maybe it is Extra Terrestrial, a cone head, thus the hat!

    ReplyDelete
  48. Did they have high heeled shoes in 28 ? It looks like a high heeled shoe to me on the last close up. The heel coming around her hand between thumb & first finger ? Maybe a old lady with Alzheimer Disease
    ( unknown back then by that name ) or someone a head of their time one .
    John

    ReplyDelete
  49. soon I discovered that this rock thing was truejerry lee lewis was the deviljesus was an architect previous to his career as a prophetall of a sudden, I found myself in love with the worldso there was only one thing that I could dowas ding a ding dang my dang a long ling longding dang a dong bong bing bong

    ReplyDelete
  50. Nikola Tesla who invented hundreds of things including TV, flourescent lights, x-ray machine etc. had developed wireless communication at that time AND had also developed a source of free wireless electricity for the world. Of course JP Morgan the good bankster that he was refused funding declaring that he would wire everyone together so he could charge people for electricity. The best book on Tesla is "The Life and Times of Nikola Tesla Biography of a Genius" by Marc J Seifer. Perhaps, just maybe this was someone testing one of Tesla's inventions?

    ReplyDelete
  51. HAHAHA, you are all so small minded, Obviously it can't be a phone?? You don't all thik that the mobile phone technology and computer technology that exists today happened when we started seeing it do you? the 1st space satalites wern't launched in the 1960's they were much earlier! Mobile phone technology is a result of alien intervention, captured space craft and back engineering.. Technology that the secret world goverments have locked away are over 200 years in advance of when we see today and have been for quite some time. Whet you are looking at is a 1928, woman in black with a mobile phone! The technology to detect digital radio signals never happened for decades! So when the general public can finally detect digital, the world goverments have moved on decades and are using something that we can't even imagine yet. It appeares she's been caugh on camera this time however!! Not a time traveller!

    ReplyDelete
  52. You have definitely got SOMETHING odd here. Might be a time traveler, but I'd think odds are better that it would be an extraterrestrial/dimensional visitor.Good luck with your own filmmaking.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Could be a time traveler. However my bets are of an old woman phoning her Psych Dr. using her hair brush! lol and iv seen old women walk like this, the older you get the more odder your stride becomes,that and if your pregnant!

    ReplyDelete
  54. What???....you people don't ever talk into your wallet?!

    C'maaaan! ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  55. Reach a little further.... It takes more streaching to believe she is not on a phone than to clearly see she is on one... Thanks to all the scientists here for clearing this up. But I will clearly state my opinion SHE IS ON A PHONE... It is obvious to anyone with half a brain and a clear eye. This may be somthing else than shown, trick photoshop, or clever camara trick but why is it there people.
    I love this and thanks for releasing it now run and hide because they are coming to erase your ass from history lol. And the brainiac's posting against you are obviously with them......

    ReplyDelete
  56. I think it's one of the Rothschilds. They were probably the only ones with cell phones back then.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Hate to be the voice of reason here, but this is Charlie Chaplin ... I wouldn't put it past him to have had this actor/actress to pretend she was talking on some super-duper impossible walkie-talkie on purpose, not unlike "I buried Paul" at the end of A Day in the Life.

    Occam's Razor, people.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Seriously! This is what makes the news these days? Oh right, the most LOGICAL explanation must be that she's a time-traveler. Not an extra in the film, wearing a costume, practicing her lines.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Well if it is a time traveller they probably were transported to the past via some kind of craft right? So they are probably talking to whoever they came with on the craft. I have always wondered if UFOS were actually humans from the future as opposed to aliens from outer space. Have any legitimate scientists checked this out yet?

    ReplyDelete
  60. I wonder why she is raising both hands. It looks like she is holding something on her right hand, another cellphone?

    ReplyDelete
  61. Putting "time travel"+Tesla into Google yields 77,000 results, including this one:

    http://uforeview.tripod.com/teslatime/teslatimetravel.html

    Also research the name "Andrew D. Basiago"; see:

    http://www.ufo-blogger.com/2010/05/darpa-teleportation-program-pegasus.html

    for a 26 part YouTube interview with Andrew see:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwE8m50sbWk

    Andrew claims to have been part of a secret project that involved teleportation and time travel, and was hailed by Buckminster Fuller as being a person of great integrity. I've listened to the above interview, and have studied his work at www.exopolitics.com and believe him. He's an exquisitely intelligent and present person in my view.

    Thanks for sharing.

    Cheers...

    ReplyDelete
  62. Listen to the 26 Part YouTube interview of Andrew D. Basiago...

    ReplyDelete
  63. It is also possible that she could listen to radio on her side .What makes me think it is a 'she' is the shoes themselves. As for her mouth movements, she could be singing while listening to it. But this footage is creepy to be honest.

    ReplyDelete
  64. It's a small carbon audiophone hearing aid invented by Western Electric in 1925 - looks just like a mobile phone. Google it!!! I bet she's just testing the batteries by talking into the microphone.

    ReplyDelete
  65. I came across this article in one of my business classes and my thought on it is that evn if it was a time traveler how would she get cell phone service?

    ReplyDelete
  66. Hi --- I watched the video segment featuring this scene from the moving "The Circus" on Youtube, which is more informative than simply a zoomed-in frame from the film.

    First, a man walks by the theatre entrance. This lady is not very far behind. They may not be together, but I get the sense they could be --- that the man (maybe husband) is simply walking more quickly.

    There aren't a lot of clues, but it could be that it is a windy day and the lady is using her left hand to try to hold down her big hat. In the video, it is pretty clear her lips are moving. It is possible she is calling out to her husband to wait up for her, or to tell him that he's passed the theatre entrance.

    What she is holding, if anything, is inconsequential. It could even be crumpled up theatre tickets.

    A cellphone or smartphone would *not* have worked at that time as there was no infrastructure to support it.

    My 2 cents on the matter.


    -CoastingAlong

    ReplyDelete
  67. @ Last Anonymous .. Too many May Be .. Lolz

    ReplyDelete
  68. This is probably a traveller from outerspace. The device is bigger than a cell phone since it has to communicate with the mother ship. Since its an alien, he does not understand dress sense of earth which explains his mismatch clothing. Their technology must be limited since they have not yet invented headsets or hands free devices. Since there is a mother ship, there must be more aliens about. So we should be watching more charlie chaplin and even Laurel n Hardy films to look for moreof these aliens

    ReplyDelete
  69. i think its a nazi. hitler was rumored to have started a time travelling program back in his day. He would definitely want to go back and insert himself into 1920s charlie chaplain movies as propaganda for his future 4th riech which he wants to occur on 10/21/2012

    ReplyDelete
  70. forgive me if this seems like just another visting tourist from another planet...

    ReplyDelete
  71. Interesting film piece, and so are the various theories. But until a total exam of this clip with what this person is actually holding in their left hand. I'll reserve judgment.
    It is interesting to conjecture on.

    ReplyDelete
  72. get a lip reader to decypher what she is saying.

    ReplyDelete
  73. A cell phone wouldn't work back then. Therefore, it is impossible for her to be a time traveler. The only logical explanation is that she's from another world/dimension.

    ReplyDelete
  74. It is very strange, something like this requires scientific analysis.
    cell phones were not in existence in those days, it was many,many years before they were invented.
    He does say that, is it on any other copies, if not where does this come from.
    Unfortunately you will have the nuts and crackpots coming up with stupid comments.
    This guy is genuine, he asks for an explanation about this, there appears not one who can come up with any explanation.
    Someone look at another Chaplin circus movie then come up with your comments
    eric

    ReplyDelete
  75. I wonder what a lip reader could make of this?

    My guess is on a film set people would be rehearsing lines and not shy of talking out loud. Hand up to the ear perhaps to cut out noise.

    But there is something else about this footage that weird me out...

    ReplyDelete
  76. Its the Observer!

    ReplyDelete
  77. people are still not ready for the truth even thou it is staring them at the face. time travel is possible with the use of high energy magnetic field. to go forward in time you need a very accurate amount of positive energy and vice versa. so how to build one? start with the principle of magnetic field, all begins there.

    ReplyDelete
  78. have you ever tried to track down the raw footage from this shot. there may be more footage that ended up on the cutting room floor.

    ReplyDelete
  79. Oh my god.
    Is it not more like this.

    A woman walking to a shop with her black purse in her hand, She sees the camera and gets Camera shy. Shes hold her hand up to block her face with her wallet still in her wand and curses to herself that she is being video taped. People were very shy then. shes hiding her face with her purse in her hand on the way to a shop and saying somting along the lines of - dam new fandagled camreas cant a person get some pieace. lol time traveler..... what a giggle,,,,

    ReplyDelete
  80. I don't dispute time travel and the video is very interesting but I do have one problem. If she is indeed a time traveler why is she wearing clothes of that time period instead of where she came from? It does look like a phone for sure though.

    ReplyDelete
  81. It is 1928, a lot of things were invented at that time that never made it to market because of the stock market crash, could this be one of the many things from then the public has never before seen? Maybe..and it is Hollywood, Hollywood = Rich people even then, and in my opinion if anyone has first access to something,,it's the Rich, but who knows great eye for spotting this one.

    ReplyDelete
  82. She is definitely talking, because at the last couple of frames, you can see her mouth moving, and as she pauses her pace, you can see her emotive expression. Just like today, when we talk on the phone, many of us are emotive at times, and have facial expressions, even though it is only an audio communication device.

    My question is- Who is this time traveler talking to? There are no cell towers in 1928. Maybe the radio signals travel through time, and she is talking to the present, or even our future. Or maybe she had an accomplice? (not cellular, but direct radio)

    ReplyDelete
  83. nigs gonna nig, she is talking and does have a device near her ear, this one was already solved. who she is talking to is not important, the lady is deaf. she was using a hearing aid. which had to be held near to her ear for it to work........oh no my time travels. what delusion will i latch on to now. in case you're wondering this was solved by someone else I'm just here to quell the masses

    -sevensign

    ReplyDelete