Searching...
Feb 16, 2012

Alien Encounters: The Wright-Patterson Connection

print this page
send email
Down below WDTN-TV Channel 2 Dayton, Ohio video recording is an investigative look at the Roswell "incident." In it, narrator and producer Carl Day reported on stories of wreckage and alien bodies being shipped to Wright-Patterson Field, he interviewed Kevin Randle and Donald R. Schmitt, authors of "The Truth About the UFO Crash at Roswell," and conducted numerous interviews with Air Force personnel, a photoanalysis expert, and numerous others to attempt to determine if there had been a government "cover-up." Department of Defense.

Department of the Air Force. Office of the Secretary. Office of the Administrative Assistant. Office of the Deputy for Security and Special Investigative Programs. Research Declassification Team. (1987 - ) Made possible by a donation from Mark Rosch

Rate this posting:
{[['', '']]}
{["Useless", "Boring", "Need more details", "Perfect"]}

3 comments:

  1. Ok. at 10:16 and 10:25 the Military Man pretty much sums it up, "If it were Unidentified it would be brought here because in fact that is our job."

    The other thing I picked up was this. If the Above Top Secret spy Balloon was hit by a UFO that came too close when it was investigating it, that could account for 2 sperate crash sites that day. If the UFO somehow got tangled in a 600 foot long Top Secret balloon and ripped off part of it and crashed with part of it while the other parts came down nearby, that would explain a lot.

    I also wonder how this case would do in a court of Law?

    Just my 2 cents...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rosswell Reports Vol 1 is a very good explanation of all events. As a conclusion, no ufos were ever retrieved in New Mexico. It's been only a series of events misused by hoaxers who want to profit of people's ingenuity. However, this does not mean other incidents are not under the classification of ufos, such as the South African incident in Zimbabwe, where 60 children saw a ship landing and two beings of varying features exploraring the surroubndings.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Any one who actually uses information from an Air Force liaison that actually is willing to speak about the issue should know from the beginning that they will not get a strait answer or more than half truths. It amazes me how easy people forget that the military has been caught lying to the public about these incidents for decades. What makes you think that this mouth piece in a suit can actually get any truth out of them. Please wake up.

    ReplyDelete