Searching...
Mar 10, 2012

Giant Human Finger Found In Egypt

print this page
send email
Allegedly down below pictures were photographed in Egypt by photographer Gregor Spörri in 1988. Europe's biggest newspaper bild.de is showing them for the first time in public "exclusively".

What you are looking at is a gigantic 15 inches long, mummified humanoid finger and the creatures height would be over 16.4 feet! 

Article Translation : 
In 1988, on the last day of his private investigation trip, he contacted an old man from a grave robber dynasty. The meeting was took place in a farm-house in Bir Hooker, 100 kilometers northeast of Cairo.

After paying, $ 300 Spörri had a look at the grave robber unsold treasure. Wrapped in old rags was the bone and dermis.

Spörri told BILD.de: "It was an oblong package, smelled musty. I was totally flabbergasted when I saw the dark brown giant finger.

I was allowed to take it in hand and also to take pictures; a bill was put next to it to get a size comparison. "The bent finger was split open and covered with dried mold."It was surprisingly easy, maybe a few hundred grams My heart was up to his neck. That was incredible. In size to a matching body should have been about 15 feet tall"

The grave robber also showed the Swiss certificate of authenticity and an X-ray image. Both are from the 60s.
Source: http://www.bild.de/news/mystery-themen/mystery/in-aegypten-gefunden-23053704.bild.html
Its not a first time that Giant human body part was discovered or photographed.

The down below petrified finger found in cretaceous limestone, belonged to a "prehistoric" human. Broken short of the middle joint, it measures 7.6 cm (3 inches). At full length it would measure about 15 cm (6 inches). In the photo, it is compared to a regular full-length finger. Excavations of this limestone has also revealed a child's tooth and human hair.


Sectioning reveals the typical porous bone structure expected in a human finger. Cat-scan and MRI identified joints and traced tendons throughout the length of the fossil. 

Cat-scan shows dark areas interpreted as the interior of bones and marrow. Areas less dense than surrounding stones, easily pass X-rays, causing darkening of the image. Black area is caused by sectioning.

Source :  http://www.scribd.com/doc/59685586/Giant-Humans

Giants in the Hindu epics and Vedas

In the world of the Ramayana and Mahabharata, Rakshasas are a populous race of supernatural humanoids. There were both good and evil rakshasas, and as warriors they fought along side the armies of both good and evil. They are powerful warriors, expert magicians and illusionists. As shape-changers, they can assume various physical forms, and it is not always clear whether they have a true or natural form. As illusionists, they are capable of creating appearances which are real to those who believe in them or who fail to dispel them. Some of the rakshasas are said to be man-eaters, and make their gleeful appearance when the slaughter on the battlefield is at its worst. Occasionally they serve as rank-and-file soldiers in the service of one or the other warlord.

Aside from its treatment of unnamed rank-and-file Rakshasas, the epic tells the stories of certain members of the race who rose to prominence, some of them as heroes, most of them as villains.

In the Ramayana

According to the Ramayana, the Raksha people (also known as Raksasas) were the inhabitants of Sri Lanka who were said to have lived among the Naga, Yakkha, and Deva, and governed Sri Lanka in 2370 BCE

In the Mahabharata

The Pandava hero Bhima was the nemesis of forest-dwelling Rakshasas who dined on human travellers and terrorized human settlements.

Hidimba was a cannibal Rakshasa who was slain by Bhima. The Mahabharata (Book I: Adi Parva, Section 154) describes him as a cruel cannibal with sharp, long teeth and prodigious strength. When Hidimba saw the Pandavas sleeping in his forest, he decided to eat them. He made the mistake of sending his sister Hidimbi to reconnoiter the situation, and the damsel fell in love with the handsome Bhima, whom she warned of the danger. Infuriated, Hidimba declared himself ready to kill not only the Pandavas but also his sister, but he was thwarted by the heroism of Bhima, who defeated and killed him in a duel.

Ghatotkacha, was the son of Bhima and Hidimbi. His name refers to his round bald head with ghata meaning pot and utkacha meaning head in Sanskrit.

Ghatotkacha, when he was young, lived with his mother Hidimbi, when one day he had a fight with Abhimanyu, his cousin, without knowing that Abhimanyu was Arjuna's son.

Ghatotkacha is considered to be a loyal and humble figure. He made himself and his followers available to his father Bhima at any time; all Bhima had to do was to think of him and he would appear. Like his father, Ghatotkacha primarily fought with the mace.

Rigveda 7.104.24

O warrior! You should destroy both the male Rakshas and female Rakshas who kills by deceit . May such Rakshas not see the light of dawn.

They are termed as Yatudhaan (those who attack human dwellings) and Kravyaad (those who eat raw flesh).

Rigveda 7.104.17


A female Rakshasi who like an owl ventures out to kill in night should be destroyed along with other Rakshas.

Rigveda 7.104.18


O Powerful Ones! You should stand up to protect the masses and capture the Rakshas who intend to kill and destroy peace in night.

Rigveda 7.104.21


The king should destroy those Rakshas who kill others and destroy peaceful activities.

Rigveda 7.104.22


Destroy the Rakshas who attack like an owl, hound, wolf , eagle or vulture.

Rigveda 7.104.15

May I be killed today itself, if I become a Yatudhaan (one who attacks human dwellings) or reduce the life of any human. But if I am not so, those who falsely implicate me as being a Yaatudhaan be destroyed.

Giant Human Femur

Rate this posting:
{[['', '']]}
{["Useless", "Boring", "Need more details", "Perfect"]}

16 comments:

  1. Esto es Biblico viene en genesis y en otros libro de la biblia 100% verdad.

    ReplyDelete
  2. No no es cierto, la Biblia sigue siendo muy falsa en muchos aspectos.

    ReplyDelete
  3. These are problely the Nephellims

    ReplyDelete
  4. well no annanuki s or anything .. these are just humans ...humans were that tall in previous time... with time we became the size we are now... thats is why earlier human beings could built such monuments as pyramids n all... no aliens ... as simple as it is...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I dont mean to offend you, but thats what the popular human evolution theory suggest, and there is much evidence to say this is not the case. As there is no missing link discovered yet, and there never will be.

      Evidence is actually saying that we did not evolve into what we are today, and we simply came to existence in this form. As evidence is also suggesting many, if not all, fauna species also did not evolve into there current form, and also simply came to be in the form they are in today.

      Basically what I am saying is, there is actually more evidence out there to support a creation theory, rather than a evolution theory. It just doesnt get acknowledge in the mainstream science world.

      AcesHigh

      Delete
    2. You're just so.... Sad? Blind? Uneducated? Heck, maybe you're an internet troll and this is me taking the bait; I don't know. What I do know is this, you've never actually read any of the "scientific" studies that presented the "evidence" you mention above. They're almost entirely half-cooked, biased, or occasionally even just jokes the people preforming the "study" came up with to promote scientific debate.

      For instance the people who threw up the idea that the sun could theoretically be powered by the converted potential energy of particles falling towards the sun and that could give the solar system roughly a 6000 year life span from start to now. They openly came out and said it was a joke to foster debate but the hopeless refused to let go.

      It can be hard to watch but the overly religious cling to these like a drowning man to a life-raft (I'd call you an extremist but that seems to be a colloquialism for terrorist these days and I'd rather not be misinterpreted)

      I find it sadly funny how so often people who "open themselves to the light" ironically trap themselves in the dark.

      People like you, who refuse to educate themselves and wish to hamper the education of others are a pox. Not just on modern society but on all past present and future. Please, please have yourself sterilized(it's actually the most earth conscientious thing a person can do right now) or at the very least don't force your ignorant views on your children and let them choose for themselves.

      Kindly E.S.A.D.

      Delete
    3. There will never be an actual missing link that the religious will ever accept. If it is a monkey with human type feet, they will say it is only a monkey. It has been shown in the fossil record that we were closer to the smaller monkey form but of course that is never good enough. Every time something is shown that may conflict with religion, the religious become angry and they have a hundred different reasons and as many fabrications to show how the thing really supports religion. Regrettably however, none of their finding stand up to claim when studied extensively. Scientists would be happy to find something that actually verified a real God. That scientist would be the most loved person in the world and wealthy beyond Microsoft. Hard as we try (while being totally accurate and reasonable) no evidence to verify any God has ever been found, and that includes the Christian Gods. Believe me, we have looked. I am a scientist, and I would love to find proof. I have spent my life looking, but nothing exists but the bible, but it was admittedly written by humans and then translated and rewritten so many times it is impossible to know the actual text (translated from lost languages).

      Delete
  5. I alredy imagine this guy picking nose :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. @Anonymous

    The most ignorant comment. Ever.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Even men that are now above 6 feet have "nephilic traits!"
    i believe that the first offspring of the nephilims were more angelic than human because they had to manipulate their form to fit the human size in order to relate sexually with averagely sized women.
    So i think they were 70% angelic and 30% human for then to have the ability to change their form...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OMG almost as bad as the religious cultist that calls it church up there

      Delete
    2. Whew, that's really RIPE! 70% angelic and 30% human eh? Either you are totally brainwashed by religion or you have lost all rational thought.

      Delete
  8. @Anonymous

    The only reason there's no "missing link" is because every time science provides one, all the religious idiots go "No no, but what's the link between THAT and the next one?". Not only has science shown many "missing links" but there is an unbroken chain of missing links showing human evolution all the way back to 3 feet high proto-humans in Africa. Evolution is not in doubt AT ALL, no matter how much ignorant people like you would like to think it is.

    ReplyDelete
  9. No proof of a full evolutionary chain. They have found fossils that can be mapped to older primates, however they cannot be linked to us. The subjects they try to put forward can be easily dismissed for science has shown it would have to be a complete transformation and not evolution if we were linked to these so called missing links. We know there were four major fossil groups that can be traced back to upright bi-pedal primates. That is were the chain stops, it's them and then us. It would take another 4 million years for the bones or entity to change in the evolutionary process and yet we pop up out of nowhere within 250,000 years. In my opinion the four groups I referred to earlier still exist. Sighted all over the globe known as bigfoot, yeti or many other names. Archeological findings point to evidence in the summarian culture which is the oldest known culture to have proof of language and writing. According to them an alien race came to earth took the genes of the four groups and their own genes to make us. Explaining how we popped up out of nowhere. Oh and don't you think it's kind of odd that our last 2 chromosomes are fused? I don't believe evolution could do that in 100 billion years.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I love the comment above. The evidence for the evolution of modern man - well that seems lacking. Bigfoot and the Yeti? Yeah, that's probably true.

    Oh, and the fused chromosome in humans could not happen given 100 billion years? So the entire universe to form in current state circa 13.7 billion years, but the fusing of a chromosome... now that would take 100 billion years. :o

    ReplyDelete