. Brazilian Astronomer claims there's a rogue planet hidden behind Neptune.
. American Astronomical Society tried to censor the information by wiping out the name of the speaker from the list of invited speakers from their website.
Brazilian astronomer/astrophysicist Rodney Gomes, of the National Observatory of Brazil in Rio de Janeiro, made a presentation at the meeting of American Astronomical Society in Timberline Lodge, Oregon, about his theory that there's a rogue planet hidden behind Neptune, messing with the orbits of the objects of the Kuiper Belt.Rodney Gomes says the new planet could be anywhere from half to four times the size of Earth and is likely a rogue planet that floated over from another solar system.
Brazilian astronomer/astrophysicist Rodney Gomes, of the National Observatory of Brazil in Rio de Janeiro, made a presentation at the meeting of American Astronomical Society in Timberline Lodge, Oregon, about his theory that there's a rogue planet hidden behind Neptune, messing with the orbits of the objects of the Kuiper Belt.Rodney Gomes says the new planet could be anywhere from half to four times the size of Earth and is likely a rogue planet that floated over from another solar system.
Depictions of this supposed planet, based in the astronomical model of Gomes, put it as a serious candidate to be planet X.
Rogue planet:
A rogue planet — also known as an interstellar planet, nomad planet or orphan planet — is a planetary-mass object which has either been ejected from its system or was never gravitationally bound to any star, brown dwarf or other such object, and that therefore orbits the galaxy directly.Astronomers believe that either way, the definition of planet should depend on current observable state and not origin.
Larger planetary-mass objects which were not ejected, but have always been free-floating, are thought to have formed in a similar way to stars, and the IAU has proposed that those objects be called sub-brown dwarfs(an example of this is Cha 110913-773444 which may be an ejected rogue planet, or it may have formed on its own and be a sub-brown dwarf)
Later on the name of Rodney Gomes and his topic were just wiped off of the speakers list of the meeting in Oregon.
Later on the name of Rodney Gomes and his topic were just wiped off of the speakers list of the meeting in Oregon.
According to National Geographic he made his presentation in May 8 conveniently one day later the website of the meeting was updated and his name is seen nowhere in the list of invited speakers:
Source: http://dda.harvard.edu/meetings/2012/
Main Stream Media News Link : http://now.msn.com/living/0514-secret-planet.aspx
', '
']]}
It is not planet X. According to Alex Collier it is just another third density human planet being moved into this solar system. He said it will be coming in by Neptune. So there you have it.
ReplyDeleteXT4
@Anonymous
ReplyDeleteI thought Alex Collier was just a man on LSD effect. Serious question, is he really reliable?
Seems the american astronomical sociaty as with all the others (seti,nasa ect)are keeping somthing from the population ,i wonder what !!!!!!truth is far stranger than fiction ;)
ReplyDelete@Bers81
ReplyDeleteAccording to Alex Collier on 23rd March 1994, a frequency started to emit from black holes. These pockets of energy released by the black holes have been photographed by NASA. They are called fermi bubbles.
According to Alex Collier Phobos MAY be in orbit around Earth. Remember last year how the Russian probe heading for phobos mysteriously got stuck in Earths orbit? Maybe it did find Phobos after all.
Believe only what you want to.
XT4
Alex col-LIAR...that guys a nut job.
ReplyDeletePlanet X has been in our solar system since 2003. Weather got alot more extreme after that year did it not?
ReplyDeleteHis name is in here...
ReplyDeletehttp://dda.harvard.edu/meetings/2012/DDA2012Abstracts.pdf
His name @Anonymous thanks for sharing this link. I have just saved it as, it might possible they could also remove this pdf from their server too.
ReplyDeleteAlex Collier... what a looser...
ReplyDeleteSaddle up....talk the truth, live the love
ReplyDeleteSearch revelation of the pyramids on youtube
The name Rodney Gomes appears in the Meeting Schedulle archive (the Meeting Schedule is much more detailed and not only lists the invited notorities):
ReplyDeleteWednesday, 9 May, 2012
...
5:00PM - 5:20PM 07.09: Resonant Flyby and Tour Design Using Heteroclinic Connections
- Rodney L. Anderson, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
Source: http://dda.harvard.edu/meetings/2012/DDA2012TalkSchedule.pdf
The resume of the appresentation of Gomes apresentation:
05.01: Signatures Of A Putative Planetary Mass Solar Companion On The Orbital Distribution Of Tno's And Centaurs
- Rodney S. Gomes, J. S. Soares
Observatorio Nacional, Brazil. Gomes et al. 2006 (Icarus 184, 589) show that a planetary mass solar companion (PMSC) can produce orbits in an inner Oort cloud that can account for Sedna's orbit. On the other hand, one should expect that this faraway planet would also produce some peculiar orbital distribution for distant TNO's and Centaurs.
A pair of interesting orbits in this respect are those of 2006 SQ372 and 2000 OO67. These objects have very large semimajor axes and perihelion between Uranus and Neptune orbits. It has been claimed that a likely source for 2006 SQ372 is the Oort cloud. Yet a PMSC has an important effect on objects at inner Oort cloud distances, say between 300 AU and 2000 AU, to make their perihelion distances to continually oscillate with a large enough amplitude to account for objects both inside and outside Neptune's orbit.
This naturally produces an extra amount of TNO's with semimajor axes between 300 and 2000 AU and perihelion inside Neptune's orbit, like 2006 SQ372 and 2000 OO67. This signature should be found in present observations. To deal with this problem we construct a numerical simulator and apply it to populations of distant TNO's produced by numerical integration of planetesimals and planets according to the Nice model, eitherincluding or not a PMSC.
With the results from the numerical simulator we compare the model with and without the PMSC with observations.We conclude that a PMSC is compatible with the existence of 2006 SQ372 and 2000 OO67 and, in fact, although not conclusively, we can alsoclaim that the observations of 2006 SQ372 and 2000 OO67, compared to all other scattered objects, would be lucky events if no PMSC exists.
fonte: http://dda.harvard.edu/meetings/2012/DDA2012Abstracts.pdf
[ ]´s