Recently we had received the email from National Geographic channel representative, down below is extract of the email:
I’m reaching out on behalf of National Geographic Channel to share some info about a new series “Chasing UFOs” premiering June 29th and to invite you to view an advance screener of the show and participate in a mini blog carnival we’ll be hosting in promotion for it late next week.
“Chasing UFOs” features a team of pioneering investigators who push the limits to find the truth behind unexplained UFO sightings. These real-life “Scullys and Mulders” are not looking for more stories on extraterrestrial activity — they want answers. Comprising one believer, one skeptic and one undecided, the dynamic team collects video footage of unusual-shaped lights over Arizona, meets with an alleged alien abduction survivor in Colorado and even tracks glowing orbs near NASA’s Kennedy Space Center. You can check out previews and more at www.natgeotv.com/chasingufos
', '
']]}
Dear Kristin,
ReplyDeletedon't sell yourself out, all they want is to exploit you and take your informations and make profit out of it for them. THEY will get the money not you, THEY will get credits not you. It is called marketing. The topic about UFO's is getting popular and they need to find a way to make profit out of it.
Aliens do exist and visit us, if they wanted they would contact us in public but we are not ready. How can we contact aliens if so much racial hate, greed, jealously, ignorance, arrogance, war, intolerance is in our world? Aliens are not interested and will not contact us until we grow up.
777
I lov u mayne...thanks for the word of mouth....lets just keep our self,awake,lets change now,....ONE LOVE YO'........WE ALL ONE
DeleteIt's not going to be anything new.......It's all just for the money.....Do you really think ANY answers will be given? Most likely more debunks than facts.....if not just a LOOOLNG Re-viewing of ALL the stuff we have already seen.....Lol glad its not me.....I wouldn't even give them the time of day.....unless They say, "We Found answers and video footage of a(n) extraterrestrial and his craft." Anything less I wouldn't even consider. Chances are they will all just chase each other in a circle.
ReplyDeleteJust watched the first 2 episodes. They used a friend of mine's night vision footage in a couple of places in the Texas episode. They could have done much better, although they did not totally try to debunk everything they left out so much regarding the Stephenville sightings. I recently had the luck to meet and hear 2 of the main witnesses and spend an evening sky watch where the pilot, Steve Allen, had his sighting. I mean you have a 360 degree view of the sky out there. I don't know why Nat Geo didn't try to have a shooting there.
ReplyDeleteI also saw a presentation regarding the radar reports from that night. Several very experienced men evaluated stack and stacks of these reports from several different radars in the area. They determined the presence of unknowns and the F16s! Nat Geo totally left that out.
Also when you can hear these people speak in person about what they saw, you can see and hear the raw emotion; they definitely saw something that shook them up and made them question deep beliefs. I do not think Nat Geo was able to capture that as much as they could have. The airplane "test" was a big waste of time.
With all their access to equipment and analysis, why did we not see more about what Ryder captured? Where is the expert analysis of the video shot 3 months after the sighting?
They seem to be following some king of tired formula for these kind of shows. The second episode did not impress me even as much as the Texas episode. I will hope they can do a little better with the next ones!
Don't get sucked in Kristin... NatGeo has no interest in discovering UFOs visiting earth... all of their UFO shows debunk them (or attempt to)... they're in it for the cash...
ReplyDeleteI watched the first two episodes tonight as well and was pretty underwhelmed and hates the "face cam" shots of them running around in the dark. Frankly, this show reminded me a lot of the Ufo Hunters show where they talk to a lot of people and never come up with any conclusive evidence.
ReplyDeleteI guess we will just have to wait for the day for a UFO to either land or crash somewhere near a populated area where the evidence will be irrefutable and the government wont be able to hide it or cover it up. Until then its just going to be a lot of horrible camera shots at night time where you cant really make anything out and a lot of eye witness stories than dont prove anything anyway.
i wanted to like it, i really did !!
ReplyDeletebut after watching part of the first, i changed the channel. they where doof and the camra shots make me dizzy. they where running around like a bunch of kids on speed. there was no real footage besides what the witnesses had. and they acted so drama with noise in the woods. just wanted to yell at them " your looking for ufo, not bigfoot, stop looking in the woods and LOOK UP" !! LoL
Quote Anon - "Ufo Hunters show where they talk to a lot of people and never come up with any conclusive evidence."
ReplyDeleteThat's because there is no conclusive evidence. If there was there would be no need for any of these programs. Considering what they have to work with UFO Hunters does a fairly good job of presenting what factual and observational evidence is available.
Another Anon.
@Aquawoman12 Nat. Geo. is only allowed to "share" so much (or little) as the government will let them. Conspiracy theory? Yeah maybe...but they know the world populace can handle only so much! Personally,I say bring it on. I've seen enough to make my mind up! And I literally mean,"Seen!"
ReplyDeleteFollow the money. The government funds nat geo programming. It's what THEY want you to think...
ReplyDeletewhat about the footage from the rooftop of this video http://youtu.be/j-ZGgjdIdxQ can you at National Geographic get this proof. it would possibly be the best UFO footage ever.
ReplyDeletei belive i saw one
ReplyDeletei wish i had a phone